Comments on: Cute animals don’t belong in my pussy

By: kateanon

kateanon — Mon, 03 Nov 2008 05:54:23 +0000

Hysterical, I’m glad I’m not the only one shying away from the “animal” world…

By: Miss Honey

Miss Honey — Sun, 26 Oct 2008 19:54:50 +0000

I so have to agree with this dicussion. The bunny ears are so entirely pointless and totally get in the way. This so made me laugh. Thank you for sharing this conversation.

By: Rae

Rae — Thu, 23 Oct 2008 23:22:05 +0000

Oh, I so agree! Hello, I’m new here…but I have looked and looked and looked for vibes that don’t have animals on them, and it’s damned near impossible. Especially for my budget range. Or people! I saw one with a Pharaoh on it! What?! There is something just weird about putting a (upper) head IN my pussy–could be a weird porn I saw as a freshman in college though. :-\

Thank you for addressing this, I thought i was the only one who thought this was beyond weird.

By: coy pink

coy pink — Sun, 19 Oct 2008 00:43:46 +0000

I am finding this so amusing. That I post a silly little rant about not caring for animal-themed sex toys and I get so many comments. It’s great!

@Nobilis – There is no “foofaraw.” Yes, it’s personal preference. And a silly conversation between two friends on a ridiculous subject that I thought was funny enough to turn into a blog post. However, if all animal-themed toys stopped being produced, would the segment of the public that chooses those toys stop buying sex toys altogether? I can say for myself, if the ONLY choice I was given for sex toys were those that looked like animals, I’d probably just go ahead and buy them, if I wanted a sex toy. But all of this is really irrelevant because I’m sure as long as someone is buying the animal toys, the toy makers will continue to produce them.

By: Caracala

Caracala — Fri, 17 Oct 2008 19:00:11 +0000

Amen to that! I hate all those little cutesy toys and have complained about the obsession with making them all animals like that before. Geesh, you’d think toy companies could be more creative, at the least, and understand that putting a cute mouse or cat up my pussy isn’t exactly on my to-do list.

By: Breve

Breve — Wed, 15 Oct 2008 03:28:53 +0000

thank you for having this discussion….I totally agree; the last thing I want is something that is cute….I am a grown woman after all. But I never could figure out why once upon a time maternity clothes were pastels with lace and ribbons like little girl clothes….

By: Alec

Alec — Wed, 15 Oct 2008 00:44:21 +0000

@May – Rock Chick is made in the UK, LELOs are made in Sweden, We-Vibe in the USA… seems like there are plenty of international toy makers scoffing at these international import/export laws and not putting animal faces on their stuff. Philips even got in on it recently, and they’re fairly international.

By: Nobilis

Nobilis — Wed, 15 Oct 2008 00:12:20 +0000

I don’t understand the foofaraw.

1> Is it reasonably possible to shop for a sex toy without seeing all three sorts? By this I’m speaking of:

* Cutesy (including as a subset animal themes)
* Minimalist
* Realistic

I could be wrong but I believe the answer is “no”

2> Is it reasonably possible that a significant fraction of the market may prefer a cutesy sex toy over a minimalist or a realistic sex toy?

I believe the answer to this is “Yes” because it’s reasonably possible that a significant fraction of the market may prefer ANYTHING when it comes to sex. People are polymorphous when it comes to sex.

3> Given 1> and 2> are you actually asking for this segment of the market to forego their cutesy sex toys?

I think the answer to this is “No” because I really don’t think a sex-positive person like you would actually tell anyone that safe, sane, consensual, private sex of any form is wrong.

So…

What’s the foofaraw?

Does it all boil down to “This is not my personal preference.”?

By: mina

mina — Tue, 14 Oct 2008 19:23:38 +0000

OMG! this was hilarious and YEAH for LELO! We live and breathe for LELO. That fish “toy” and the rabbit with the creepy eyes.. yeah … WTF!

By: Lilly

Lilly — Tue, 14 Oct 2008 18:35:11 +0000

@May – What countries manufacture “vibrators” that are disguised to get around import/export laws?

For example one of the worst ones we listed is a Doc Johnson toy. So I know damn well they didn’t make that lab-experiment-gone-wrong mouse/rabbit thing to get around a law.

Perhaps that excuse might have held water 25 years ago. Note that in Figleaf’s comment he said “originally intended” not “currently”.